GALVANIC REPLACEMENT AS A PERSPECTIVE APPROACH TO THE SYNTHESIS OF ELECTROCATALYSTS

Published in Herald of Technological University · Pages 51–63 · Rubric: 2. Chemical Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55421/3034-4689_2026_29_7_51 · EDN: YYHGRO
Received: 01.06.2026 Accepted: 05.07.2026 Published: 30.07.2026
The review systematizes research on the main aspects of the development and application of galvanic replacement, including the synthesis of catalysts active in electrochemical reactions: the evolution of hydrogen and oxygen during water electrolysis, oxygen reduction in fuel cells, the electrochemical conversion of CO2, and the oxidation of alcohols. Recent studies have demonstrated how galvanic replacement can be used to create a wide range of catalytic architectures, from core-shell nanostructures and hollow nanoplates to high-entropy alloys, single-atom catalysts, and nano- and micro-sized polymetallic systems based on 3d and 4d metals. Owing to the rational design of bimetallic surfaces, lattice strain, and electronic modulation of the active sites, high catalytic performance has been achieved, including ultra-low overpotentials (as low as 15 mV for the hydrogen evolution reaction and 203 mV for the oxygen evolution reaction) and operational stability exceeding 700 hours at industrial current densities. Special attention is paid to in situ spectroscopic methods and quantum-chemical calculations, which reveal the molecular nature of increased activity and stability, linking them to the type of active centers, the nature of interfacial interactions, and the dynamics of surface restructuring. Key challenges (scalability of synthesis, development of predictive computational models, reducing the reliance on platinum-group metals, and integration of catalysts into membrane-electrode assemblies) are discussed, as well as promising development directions, including broadening the range of reactions toward nitrate reduction, biomass processing, and the use of non-conventional reaction media. Taken together, these results position galvanic replacement as a key technology for the synthesis of next-generation electrocatalysts for sustainable energy.
HIGH-ENTROPY ALLOYS, MONOATOMIC CATALYSTS, OXYGEN EVOLUTION, HYDROGEN EVOLUTION, OXYGEN REDUCTION, CARBON DIOXIDE, ORGANIC ELECTROSYNTHESIS
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. H. Cheng, C. Wang, D. Qin, Y. Xia, Acc. Chem. Res., 56, 900-909 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00067.

2. S. Zhou, M. Xie, Y. Ding, Z. Wang, Q. Nguyen, K. K. Li, Y. Xia, Nano Lett., 24, 43, 13513-13519 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c02764.

3. A. F. Drevsyannikov, M. E. Kolpakov, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 92, 5, 905-908 (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418050096.

4. A. F. Dresvyannikov, M. E. Kolpakov, E. A. Ermolaeva, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 96, 2, 309-314 (2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602442202008X.

5. A. F. Dresvyannikov, M. E. Kolpakov, E. A. Ermolaeva, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 94, 6, 1098-1103 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024420060084.

6. P. Chen, S. Huang, Fuel, 364, Article 131106 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131106.

7. J. Zhao, J. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, E. Luo, B. Lv, T. Hu, J. Jia, Nanoscale, 16, 14, 7031-7040 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR06359C.

8. A. F. Dresvyannikov, M. E. Kolpakov, E. A. Ermolaeva, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 97, 10, 2136-2143 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423100072.

9. A. Qayum, K. Harrath, R. Li, A. R. Woldu, P. K. Chu, L. Hu, F. Lu, X. Yao, Small, 21, 3, Article 2408854 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202408854.

10. X. Deng, J. Chen, Q. Chen, Y. Zhou, X. Liu, J. Zhang, G. Wang, R. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 665, Article 160310 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160310.

11. W. Lin, S. Yan, N. Song, S. Gao, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 190, Article 152251 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152251.

12. L. Yao, F. Zhang, S. Yang, H. Zhang, Y. Li, C. Yang, H. Yang, Q. Cheng, Adv. Mater., 36, 25, Article 2314049 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202314049.

13. C. Li, B. Kim, Z. Li, R. Thapa, Y. Zhang, J.-M. Seo, R. Guan, F. Tang, J.-H. Baek, Y.H. Kim, J.-P. Jeon, N. Park, J.-B. Baek, Adv. Mater., 36, 31, Article 2403151 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202403151.

14. S. Ruck, A. Hutzler, S. Thiele, C. van Pham, Small Methods, 9, 4, Article 2401179 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202401179.

15. V. Nithiyasri, K. Thulasi, P. S. Kumar, Adv. Sustain. Syst., 10, 1, Article e00738 (2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202500738.

16. B. Naveen, S. W. Lee, Molecules, 30, 20, Article 4062 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30204062.

17. C. Du, Z. Wang, X. Chen, Y. Wang, C. Chen, X. Liu, Y. Huo, H. Sun, G. Xu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 88, 152-162 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.104.

18. P. Cao, C. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Li, S.-B. Cheng, M. Lin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 12, 48, 33908-33916 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA05900J.

19. H. Wu, Q. Zhang, S. Chu, H. Du, Y. Wang, P. Liu, Materials, 17, 20, Article 5082 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17205082.

20. H. Yang, S. Lee, K. Lee, H. Chang, J. Roh, D. Shin, M. Kim, E. Cho, Meet. Abstr., MA2024-02, Article 2691 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1149/MA2024-02412691mtgabs.

21. A. Banti, I. Avramova, S. Sotiropoulos, J. Georgieva, Catalysts, 15, 9, Article 895 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15090895.

22. W. Cao, M. Kumar, N. Thakur, T. Uchiyama, Y. Gao, S. Tominaka, A. Machida, T. Watanabe, R. Sato, T. Teranishi, M. Matsumoto, H. Imai, Y. Sakurai, Y. Uchimoto, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 7, 19, 8515-8525 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c01444.

23. F. Di Costola, N. B. D. Monti, I. Napal, E. Magnano, C. F. Pirri, G. Cicero, M. Fontana, F. Risplendi, S. Nappini, J. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 16, 35, 9088-9096 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01788.

24. J. Shin, Y. Gwon, S. Y. Hwang, S. Bae, S. Y. Kim, C. K. Rhee, Y. Sohn, J. Alloys Compd., 1010, Article 177660 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.177660.

25. M. Shepida, O. Kuntyi, A. Mazur, G. Zozulya, M. Sozanskyi, V. Kordan, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 768, 18, 1191-1199 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2024.2390215.

26. Z. Huang, Z. Zhang, L. Chao, X. Jia, Molecules, 29, 23, Article 5492 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29235492.

27. H. Luo, M. M. Titirici, Adv. Eng. Mater., 27, 9, Article 2402544 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202402544.

28. D. Ma, J. Zhao, J. Jia, Chem. Commun., 61, 18, 3724-3727 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CC06525E.

29. Y. Xu, W. Xu, Z. Gao, Y. Liang, H. Jiang, Z. Li, Z. Cui, E. Liu, L. Ma, S. Zhu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 17, 18, 26692-26700 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c02269.

30. A. Salah, H. D. Ren, N. Al-Ansi, A. Al-Salihy, F. A. Qaraah, S. A. Mahyoub, A. A. Ahmed, Q. A. Drmosh, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 16, 44, 60310-60320 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c13769.

31. A. F. Dresvyannikov, M. E. Kolpakov, E. A. Ermolaeva, Inorg. Mater., 60, 9, 1089-1094 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168524701395.

32. M. E. Kolpakov, A. F. Dresvyannikov, D. A. Sataraev, E.A. Ermolaeva, R. R. Gainullin, Dokl. Chem., 520, 6, 187-193 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012500825601160.

33. A. F. Dresvyannikov, M. E. Kolpakov, E. A. Ermolaeva, Tsvetnye Metally, 7, 56-61 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.17580/tsm.2020.07.07.

34. R. Loukrakpam, B. F. Gomes, M. Prokop, C. Bauer, M. Kutter, F. Baier, R. Kempe, C. Roth, J. Power Sources, 569, Article 232905 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232905.

35. E. Kolle-Görgen, G. Fortunato, M. Ledendecker, Chem. Mater., 34, 23, 10223-10236 (2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02443.

36. Y.C. Sekhar, S. Cho, Processes, 14, 9, Article 1473 (2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14091473.

37. Y. Liu, S. Mao, Y. Cheng, Y. Zhu, W. Shi, T. Wang, J. Li, P. Rao, X. Shi, Z. Wang, G. Yang, H. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Yuan, W. Sun, Y. Tang, X. Tian, Z. Kang, Coord. Chem. Rev., 562, Article 217931 (2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2026.217931.

38. R. Acheampong, K. Stewart-Thomas, M. N. Islam, H. Dhawan, J. Eastcott, S. Shahgaldi, Colloids Surf. A, 728, Article 138741 (2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.138741.

39. L. Weseler, M. A. Allam, L. C. Ibañez, C. Roth, T. Turek, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 51, Article 101233 (2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2026.101233.

40. H. Mohtasham, S. J. Sajjadi, K. Akhtari, D. Bahari, A. Salimi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 17, 50, 67882-67893 (2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c17558.

41. Z. Mukadam, S. B. Scott, M. M. Titirici, I. E. L. Stephens, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 382, 2282, Article 20230262 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0262.

42. J. He, Y. He, X. Liu, H. Sun, H. Mao, D. Yang, M. Li, S. Zhou, Y. Zhao, Mater. Rep. Energy, 6, 2, Article 100426 (2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matre.2026.100426.

43. H. Wang, X. Kang, B. Han, Chem. Sci., 15, 26, 9949-9976 (2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC02318H.