SYNTHESIS OF DIMETHYL DISULFIDE BY REACTION OF SODIUM DISULFIDE AND METHYL CHLORIDE IN A WATER-DODECANE MEDIUM IN THE PRESENCE OF OXYETHYLATED PHENOLS

Published in Herald of Technological University · Volume 29, Issue 10, 2026 · Pages 71–76 · Rubric: 2. Chemical Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55421/3034-4689_2026_29_10_71 · EDN: TDOZAH
Received: 18.09.2026 Accepted: 10.10.2026 Published: 30.10.2026
It was found that during alkylation of sodium disulfide in an aqueous organic medium with methyl chloride, the introduction of surfactant - oxyethylated nonyl phenol - neonol has a significant effect on the yield of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and the initial rate of its formation. Dodecane is used as an organic solvent. The syntheses were carried out in a stainless steel autoclave in the presence of dodecane and ethoxylated nonylphenol -neonol AF with a degree of oxyethylation of 6, 10 or 12 in the reaction mixture. After the experiment was completed, the organic phase was separated, dried, and weighed. The identification and quantification of DMDS was performed by gas chromatography. The residual content of sulfide and hydrogensulfide ions in the aqueous phase was determined by precipitation potentiometric titration using a silver nitrate solution. It has been shown that at the same dodecane concentration of 0.64 mol/l, the highest yield of DMDS over a reaction time of 15 minutes is achieved at a concentration of neonol AF 9-12 = 5.94 * 10-3 mol/l; an increase in this concentration to 7.43 * 10-3 mol/l does not lead to a further increase in the yield of DMDS. The yield of dimethyl disulfide also depends on the degree of oxyethylation of nonylphenol, with an increase in the degree of oxyethylation from 6 to 12, the yield of DMDS in 15 minutes increases from 22 to 40 and 51%. The observed effect may be associated with an increase in the interfacial surface and intensification of methyl chloride transfer in the surface-active dodecane-neonol system. When using the dodecane system : neonol AF 9-12 = 11:1, mol. The initial accumulation rate of DMDS is about 14 times higher than in the experiment without additives. The period of low reaction rate observed in the experiment without additives in the first 30 minutes is absent, in general, after 2 hours of reaction, the yield of DMDS reaches 76%. It is shown that the observed pattern is due to differences in the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, solubility, and the ability of neonols to stabilize the interfacial surface.
DIMETHYL DISULFIDE, DODECANE, NEONOL, METHYL CHLORIDE, SODIUM DISULFIDE
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. N. M. Meshchakova, V. V. Benemanskii, Bull. East Siberian Sci. Center, Siberian Branch, Russian Acad. Med. Sci., 40 (2), 209-212 (2005).

2. I. L. Knunyants, Chemical Encyclopedic Dictionary, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, Moscow, 1983, 792 p.

3. RU Patent 2,219,168 (1999).

4. A. V. Mashkina, Chemistry for Sustainable Development, 20 (2), 219-226 (2012). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OXPHTV

5. X. Tang, A. Cao, Y. Zhang, X. Chen, A. Guo, B. Hao, J. Xu, W. Fang, D. Yan, Y. Li, H. Cao, Q. Wang, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 262, 115313 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115313 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TZKJQU

6. D. Paquer, S. Smadja, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 95 (7-8), 172-175 (1976). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19760950707

7. J. Fabian, Tetrahedron, 29 (16), 2449-2456 (1973). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)93376-9

8. L. F. Power, K. E. Turner, F. H. Moore, Tetrahedron Lett., 15 (11), 875-876 (1974). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)82356-X

9. G. Klose, K. Arnold, U. Eckelmann, U. Uhlemann, Tetrahedron, 28 (24), 6019-6029 (1972). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4020(72)88136-5; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XVZCUR

10. A. F. Kolomiets, N. D. Chkanikov, Chemical Encyclopedia, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, Moscow, 1988, p. 625.

11. G. A. Blokh, Organic Vulcanization Accelerators and Vulcanizing Systems for Elastomers, Khimiya, Leningrad, 1973, 239 p.

12. O. Sigaru, Chemistry of Organic Sulfur Compounds, Khimiya, Moscow, 1975, 512 p.

13. UK Patent 987,358 (1963).

14. I. V. Koval, T. G. Oleinik, M. M. Kremlev, Issues of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, 54, 24 (1979).

15. I. V. Koval, A. I. Tarasenko, T. G. Oleinik, M. M. Kremlev, Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry, 15, 1004 (1979).

16. I. V. Koval, A. V. Kharchenko, M. M. Kremlev, Issues of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, 54, 29 (1979).

17. K. R. Rao, H. M. S. Kumar, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1 (10), 507-508 (1991). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80454-6

18. US Patent 3,565,959A (1968).

19. Chinese Patent CN1053891C (2000).

20. Chinese Patent CN105481737A (2016).

21. S. S. Mathur, N. J. Jain, M. M. More, S. B. Aher, K. V. Wagh, Indian Patent Application No. 202221046522, "Process for the preparation of disulfide compounds" (2022).

22. O.S. Kudryashova., N.A. Babchenko, A.W. Lesnov, S.A. Denisova, PGU newspaper. Chemistry, 2, 10, 16-19 (2013).

23. O. A. Reutov, A. L. Kurts, K. P. Butin, Organic Chemistry, Binom. Press, Moscow, 2004, Vols. 2 and 3.

24. J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure, 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/0470084960

25. F. A. Carey, R. J. Sundberg, Advanced Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Springer, New York, 2007. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-44899-2

26. Organic Syntheses, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1921-present.

27. A. I. Vogel, Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed., Longman, London, 1989.

28. W. J. Hickinbottom, Reactions of Organic Compounds, 2nd ed., Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 1957.

29. J. T. Davies, E. K. Rideal, Chemistry: Interfacial Phenomena, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York, 1963.