This article analyzes the quality models of teaching / learning on the example of theoretical developments and their practical implementation in terms of innovation in the education system of Australia. When developing their models, the Australian researchers attracted theoretical justification recognized by the world pedagogical science. In the process of the analysis of the extensive material (25 sources) from the Internet conclusions were made that may be of interest to improve the quality of teaching.
качество преподавания/учения, Профессиональные Стандарты Преподавания, Модель Эффективного Преподавания, Диспозиционная Кластерная Модель, диспозиции, quality of teaching/learning, Professional Teaching Standards, Quality Teaching Model, Dispositional Cluster Model, dispositions
1. Arlin, P.K. (1999). The wise teacher: A development model. Theory into Practice, 38(1), 12-17.
2. Aylor, B., Oppliger, P. (2003). Out-of-class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52(2), 122-134.
3. Brookfield, S.D. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bunch, R. (2006). Assessing and developing teacher despositions [Powerpoint]. Presentation at the Oregon Association of Teacher Educators Annual Conference. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http//defiant.corban.edu/rbunch/orate.ppt.
5. Cranton, P. (2001). Becoming an authentic teacher in higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
6. Collinson, V. (1996). Becoming an exemplary teacher: Integrating professional, and intrapersonal knowledge. Naruto University of Education. Naruto, Japan.
7. Crosswell, L., & Elliott, B. (2004). Committed teachers. The dimension of passion associated with teacher commitment and engagement. Retrieved January 1,2007, from http// eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00000968
8. Duignan, P.A., & Bhindi,N.(1997). Authenticity in leadership: An emerging perspective. Journal of educational administration, 35(3), 195-209.
9. Faull, G.A. (2008) Exceptional teachers: A case study that emphasizes dispositions when differentiating between teachers. Doctoral thesis. Faculty of Education and Arts, School of Education, University of Newcastle.
10. Freeman, L. (2007). Teacher dispositions in context. In pp.117-138. Charlotte, NC. Information Age Publishing.
11. Glatthorn, A. (1975). Teacher as person: The search for the authentic. The English Journal, 64(9), 37-39.
12. Gore, J.M., Griffiths, T. & Ladwig, J.G. (2012). Exploring ‘productive pedagogy’ as a framework for teacher learning. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Brisbane, December 2-5, 2012. Retrieved November 5, 2013, from http//www.aare.edu.au/02pap/gor02267.htm
13. Hunt, B.G., & Seney, R.W. (2001). Planning the learning environment. In F.A.Karnes&S.M. Bean (Eds.) Methods and material for teaching the gifted and talented (pp.43-89). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
14. James, K., & Asmus, C. (2000-2001). Personality, cognitive skills, and creativity in different life domains. Creativity Research Journal.13(2), 149-159.
15. Katz, L. & Raths, J. (1985). Dispositions as goals for teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education. 1(4) 301-307.
16. Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W.(2006) The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis on its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology. 33(2).84-91/
17. Killen, R. (2007). Effective teaching strategies: lessons from research and practice (4-th ed.) South Melbourne. Victoria: Thomson Social Science Press.
18. Kottler, J.A., Zehm, S.J. & Kottler, E. (2005). On being a teacher: The human dimension. Thousand Oaks, California: Crown Press.
19. Metcalfe, A., & Game, A.(2006) Teachers who change lives. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
20. Murray, H. (1999). Teaching behaviours inventory. The Teaching Professor, October, 3-4.
21. New South Wales, Department of Education and Training. (2005). Quality Teaching in NSW public schools: Discussion paper.
22. Sydney, NSW. Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.
23. Raths, J. (2006).Looking at the role of dispositions in teacher education. Retrived June 15, 2007, from http:// www.udel.edu/soe/raths/teacher_dispositions.pdf
24. Taylor, R.,& Wasicsko, M. (2000). The dispositions to teach. Presentation to the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Education. Lexington. Kentucky. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http//www.educatordispositions.org/dispositions/
25. Usher, D. (2002). Arthor Comb’s five dimensions of helper belief reformulated as five dispositions of teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at the First Annual Symposium on Educator Dispositions: Effective teacher - effective person. Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond.
26. Vialle, W., & Quigley, S. (2002). Selective students’ views of the essential characteristics of effective teachers. University of Wollongong. Retrieved November 2, 2004, from http://www.aare.edu.au/02pap/via0237.htm
27. Murtazina E.M., Batyrshina R.V., Gatinskaya V.P. Vestnik Kazan. tehnol un-ta.- 2012. T.15 - № 8. - S. 217-222.
28. Murtazina E.M., Lefterova O.I. Vestnik Kazan. tehnol un-ta.- 2012. T.15 - № 10. - S. 45-50.
29. Poholkov Yu.L. Obschestvenno-professional'naya akkreditaciya obrazovatel'nyh programm. - Tomsk: Nacional'nyy Issledovatel'skiy Tomskiy Politehnicheskiy Universitet, 2012.
30. Romanov D.A. Vestnik Kazan. tehnol un-ta, 14, 22, 350-352 (2011).
31. Slovar' soglasovannyh terminov i opredeleniy v oblasti obrazovaniya gosudarstv-uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisimyh Gosudarstv. - M., 2004. S. 55.
32. Murtazina E.M., Amirova G.G. Vestnik Kazan. tehnol un-ta. - № 20, 2013. - S. 361-365.
