A comparative analysis of calculation methods used in practice, of results pool fire has been fulfilled. Assessment of their correctness is carried out by comparison with data of known full-scale tests. It has been established that the results of calculations by different methods are significantly different from each other. It is concluded that all the methods do not quite correctly account for the influence of wind.
пожар пролива, тепловое излучение, коэффициент облученноcти, диаметр пролива, pool fire, thermal radiation, the factor of the irradiance, diameter pool
1. F.M. Gimranov, Vestnik Kazan. tehnol. un-ta, 5, 158-161 (2010).
2. R.Sh. Enaleev, A.M. Zakirov, Yu. S. Chistov, E.Sh. Telyakov, Vestnik Kazan. tehnol. un-ta, 17, 50-55 (2012).
3. GOST R 12.3.047-98 «Sistema standartov bezopasnosti truda. Pozharnaya bezopasnost' tehnologicheskih processov. Obschie trebovaniya. Metody kontrolya».
4. SP 12.13130.2009 «Opredelenie kategoriy pomescheniy, zdaniy i naruzhnyh ustanovok po vzryvopozharnoy i pozharnoy opasnosti».
5. «Metodika opredeleniya raschetnyh velichin pozharnogo riska na proizvodstvennyh ob'ektah", utverzhdennaya prikazom MChS RF ot 10.07.2009g. N 404 (red. ot 14. 12. 2010g.)
6. V. Marshall, Osnovnye opasnosti himicheskih proizvodstv. Mir, M. 1989. 672s.
7. S. Atallah, J.N. Shah, Topical report GRI-89/0176, GRI, (1990)
8. D. Nedelka, et al., Int. Conf. Liq. Nat. Gas, 2, 9, 17-20 (1989)
