Realize comparative analysis of the main methods of evaluation of software projects. Highlighted strengths and weaknesses of existing assessment methods. On the basis of the analysis we formalize requirements for the assessment model. Propose an algorithm for constructing a mathematical model of assessment.
проект, управление проектами, рейтинг успешности проектов, конус неопределенности, фактор приблизительной оценки качества, SLIM, COCOMO, COCOMO2, Function Point, PERT, project, project management, chaos report, the cone of uncertainty, Estimation quality factor, SLIM, COCOMO, COCOMO2, Function Point, PERT
1. M.V. Bahirkin, Nauchnyy vestnik MGTU GA, 184, 136-139 (2011).
2. B.W. Boehm, Software engineering economics, Prentice-Hall, P. 320 (1981).
3. S.N Parkinson, Parkinson's Law and Other Studies in Administration, Houghton-Miffin, P. 148 (1957).
4. F. P. Brooks, The mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Prentice-Hall, P.312 (2010).
5. L. David, The Measurable News. P. 24 (2002).
6. Software engineering: IFPUG 4.1 Unadjusted functional size measurement method: Counting practices manual, ISO/IEC, P. 430 (2003).
7. N.E. Fenton, S.L. Pfleeger, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, PWS Publishing Company, P. 455 (1997).
8. J. Coates, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier Science Inc, P. 235 (1999).
9. M. Shepperd, C. Schofield, Estimating software project effort using analogy, IEEE Trans Software Eng, 736-743 (1997).
10. K. Johnson, Software cost estimation, Metrics and models, University of Calgary, P. 115 (2001).
